Zero‑Blockchain Consensus (ZC‑1)

Final Technical Report

Author: Matthew Collins • Partner: Dr Maksym Koghut
Date: 11 September 2025 • Version 1.0 (Final)

📋 Executive Summary

ZC-1 seamlessly integrates Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) ordering with Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) checkpoints and Verifiable Random Function (VRF)-selected committees, further enhanced by AI-assisted rotation to ensure fairness and efficiency. The protocol delivers finality in under 2 seconds, targets scalability beyond 100,000 transactions per second (TPS), and enables seamless mobile participation through lightweight validation, data availability (DA) sampling, and delegated staking.

Designed with UK regulatory compliance in mind, it incorporates Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) incentives to promote sustainable and ethical network operations.

🎯 Design Objectives

Sub-2-Second Finality: Achieve deterministic safety guarantees with rapid transaction confirmation.

100,000+ TPS Scale: Maintain performance without compromising network security or decentralization.

Mobile-First Access: Prioritize accessibility for iOS and Android devices with lightweight clients.

Ethereum Interoperability: Ensure compatibility and implement robust cross-chain bridges.

UK Regulatory Compliance: Align with FCA and GDPR standards for institutional adoption.

ESG Integration: Promote sustainability through ESG-linked staking rewards and transparency audits.

🏗️ System Architecture

The architecture supports applications built on an Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM)-compatible execution layer, with the core consensus mechanism blending DAG-based ordering and BFT finality. Complementary modules handle Governance & ESG, Interoperability, and Compliance.

Security & Privacy features include post-quantum (PQ) cryptography and zero-knowledge (ZK) proofs for enhanced protection. Networking & Storage manages efficient gossip protocols, erasure-coded data availability, dynamic pruning, sharding, and edge gateways to optimize data distribution and access.

Key Architectural Components

⚙️ Consensus Protocol Specification

Stake, Identity, and Committees

Participants bond stake to join the network, with optional Know Your Customer (KYC) integration via trusted custodians for enhanced identity verification. Each consensus round generates a cryptographic seed, from which VRF selects a committee of K validators. A lightweight reputation system subtly biases proposer selection to favour reliable participants, promoting long-term network fairness.

DAG Ordering

Validators produce blocklets that reference at least N - f prior-round blocks (where N represents the total validator set size and f the Byzantine fault tolerance threshold). A deterministic reduction process extracts a consistent DAG cut, forming a batch candidate for validation and inclusion.

BFT Checkpoints and Finality

Finality is achieved through a two-phase voting mechanism: prevote followed by precommit. Once 2/3 or more of the stake-weighted votes are secured, the checkpoint is finalized, a receipt is broadcast, the state machine advances, and obsolete DAG sections are pruned for efficiency.

Data Availability

Transaction batches are encoded using Reed-Solomon codes into k + r shares, distributed across validators for redundant storage. Light clients verify availability by sampling m shares; any detected withholding prevents finality and incurs slashing penalties on the responsible proposers.

📱 Mobile Participation & Light Clients

Mobile devices (e.g., smartphones) engage via lightweight operations like signature verification, DA sampling, and proof checks. For active staking or validation, users can delegate through edge gateways or participate in micro-committees.

Adaptive duty-cycling adjusts activity based on battery life and thermal limits. Finality receipts encapsulate VRF epoch data, aggregate signatures, and DA proofs for verifiable transparency.

Mobile-Optimized Features

📊 Key Parameters (Recommended Defaults)

Parameter Default Notes
Validator set (n) 400–1,200 Stake-weighted selection with support for gradual validator churn
Committee size (K) 64–256 Dynamically selected via VRF per round
Fault tolerance (f) < n/3 Standard Byzantine fault tolerance bound
Batch size 1–4 MB Optimized with erasure coding for compact storage and transmission
Checkpoint interval 250–500 ms Balances latency and finality; adjustable based on network load
Gossip fan-out (g) ≈ √n Employs rotating peer sampling for efficient propagation
DA samples (m) log(k + r) + δ Ensures probability of undetected withholding is below 2⁻⁴⁰
Slashing amount 0.5–5% stake Tiered penalties scaled by violation severity
Unbonding period 14–21 days Prevents long-range attacks by delaying stake withdrawal

🔐 Cryptography & Privacy

The protocol employs post-quantum signatures (e.g., Dilithium or Falcon) for future-proof security. zkSNARKs and zkSTARKs facilitate efficient verification. Selective-disclosure techniques enable privacy-preserving KYC attestations, allowing users to reveal only necessary information during audits or compliance checks.

Cryptographic Components

⚠️ Threat & Fault Model

The system assumes an adversary controlling less than 1/3 of the total stake, capable of delaying, withholding, equivocating, or censoring messages. Clients and gateways are treated as untrusted entities.

Byzantine Adversary: Controls <33% of stake, can delay/withhold/equivocate messages
Network Partitions: Partial synchrony assumptions with adaptive timeouts
Untrusted Clients: Light clients and gateways treated as potentially compromised
Bridge Security: Light-client or ZK-based verification with challenge windows

🔬 Formal Properties

🗺️ Implementation Roadmap & Repository Mapping

Core Consensus Layer

consensus/ConsensusLayer.py - Event loop, DAG ordering, checkpointing, votes, slashing hooks

consensus/messages.py - Blocklet, Checkpoint, Vote, FinalityReceipt message types

consensus/vrf.py - VRF sortition (replace dummy with production VRF)

consensus/storage.py - In-memory DAG + checkpoint stores

Networking & Communication

networking/ - Gossip protocols, discovery, sync, finality receipts

Privacy & Governance

privacy/ - ZK verifiers; off-chain proving systems

governance/ - Delegation, referenda, parameter governance

Interoperability

interop/ - Bridge protocols (LC/ZK or threshold + slashing)

🧪 Testnet Roll‑out & Benchmarking Plan

Phase 0: Localnet Testing

Simulated faults and edge cases in controlled environment

Phase 1: Devnet Deployment

Limited to ≤200 validators for initial validation and testing

Phase 2: Incentivized Testnet

Scaling to ≥600 validators for real-world stress testing

Benchmarking Metrics

💻 High‑Level Pseudocode

while True:
    seed = derive_seed_from_last_checkpoint()
    committee = vrf_sortition(validators, seed, size=K)
    if self in committee:
        msg = build_blocklet(pending_txns, refs=dag.select_refs(N_minus_f))
        msg.zk_attest = optional_zk_attestations(msg)
        broadcast(msg)
    dag.update(received_messages)
    if dag.has_checkpoint_candidate():
        cand = dag.best_checkpoint()
        votes = bft_prevote_precommit(cand, threshold=two_thirds_stake)
        if votes.commit:
            finalize(cand)
            emit_finality_receipt(cand)
            prune_old_dag(cand)
            rotate_reputation_scores()

💰 Economic Model & ESG Compliance

Transactions incorporate a base fee plus optional tip; validators earn tips alongside a portion of base-fee rebates, aiming for a 6–12% annual staking yield. Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) is mitigated through fair DAG ordering and encrypted mempool phases.

ESG integration offers staking multipliers or bonus token emissions for validators demonstrating sustainable practices, such as energy-efficient operations. Pseudonymous on-chain commitments are complemented by off-chain KYC through custodians for UK regulatory compliance.